GAY ARE A “most at risk population”-MARPs IN UGANDA
BACKGROUND:
The
following are the Most at risk populations in Uganda:
1. Fishing
Communities; HIV Prevalence, slightly over 20%.
2. In-mates; 13%
HIV Prevalence among females; 10% HIV Prevalence among males, 2003 (MoH).
3. CSW; 47% HIV Prevalence 2003 (MoH); 2009(UNFPA)-KAP
Survey
4. GAY; Sodomy
Laws, life imprisonment, not accepted and difficult to provide targeted
services. There are situations that predispose gay people to un negotiated sex
e.g., those who pay for sex-17% and those who engaged in unprotected receptive
sex 37%, AIDS BEHAVIOUR, 2007 . Untreated and undiagnosed anal
gonorrhoea, anal Chlamydia, anal warts, Genital warts, HSV-1 in gay people
predisposes them to HIV, SYDNEY STUDY, 2009. MSM HIV Prevalence is 13.7%, Crane
Survey, 2010.
5. Uniformed
services
6. Persons
staying away from their stable partners for long.
7.
Those who face; violence, abuse and
discrimination.
LESSONS LEARNT:
In Uganda
most gay also live a heterosexual life in order to reduce on
repercussions of a same sex life. Issues that fuel vulnerability, risk and
marginalization include: criminalisation, poverty, low skills, low risk
perception, tendency to depict MARPs as societal slug in media, unwillingness
to match decisions by MARPs with prioritized interventions and poor health
seeking behaviour among MARPs.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1.
Behavioural
Approaches; where issues such as early sexual debuts, vaginal virginity, dress,
same sex sexual intercourse, penetrative/non penetrative sexual intercourse,
substance use/abuse and use of support groups will be an entry point in
understanding gay Ugandans.
2.
Gauge
risk perceptions around same sex sexual intercourse; In order to demystify fact
that goes around attributing no risk to unprotected anal sexual intercourse.
3.
Knowledge
of best practices; Such as established support groups or organisations.
Especially using their activity plans.
4.
Knowledge
of rights; by engaging gay communities in understanding the burden of
responsibilities, values and good conduct. It would also be an opportunity to
promote understanding of rights and exercise of basic rights such as: identity
and associations.
5.
Confidence
drives to improve attitudes towards self, others and community; This will help
in a conscientisation for consistence culture for those at work to ensure
survival or in schools to attain skills. It will also be an opportunity to
improve self-image and self worth. It will reduce inferiority complexes among
many who do not want to use their positions or identity to contribute to their
own good.
6.
Generated
documentation; In turn this will inform policy to effect programmes and
interventions targeting gay community by allocating budget votes.
7.
Public
Health/Human Rights Models; The current
criminalisation environment has made the
criminal, justice, legal system a persecution frame work for persons in same
sex relations in Uganda and for those working to decrease discrimination among
society. This is destructive.
CONCLUSION:
The
gay are MARPs. It will be disaster if policy decided to criminalize this kind
of relations and witch-hunt them since most are also formally set in
heterosexual families.
Comments
Post a Comment